The purpose of this assignment is to analyze the leadership process from an experiential standpoint and to apply theories of leadership to your experience.
For this paper, focus on a group you belong to at work (or alternate organization) such as a task force, department, or committee. You may use the same group from Paper #1 or a different group that you are a member of. Write a 6-8 page analysis applying a relevant leadership theory to the groupâ€™s leadership dynamic. Use a standard 12 font, normal margins, and double spacing. Submit your paper on Canvas by 11:59pm on its due date. Detailed guidelines for the content and organization of the paper are below.
Each paper must advance a clear and specific thesis. Further, the paper should be restricted to material that supports the thesis statement. State your thesis early in a brief introduction, and underline it. In preparing your thesis statement, you need to select one particular leadership theory from chapter 7, and then show how that theory applied to your group. Here are a few examples of appropriate thesis statements (but of course, you should develop your own):â€œIn this group, the functional leadership approach actually hindered our productivity.â€â€œIn this group, contingent leadership helped to preserve group harmony.â€â€œThis groupâ€™s leader exhibited all the right traits yet failed to galvanize his followers.â€
Develop the following three sections of the paper (please clearly label each section):
Begin with a background discussion of the selected leadership theory (often referred to as “approach” in your textbook). Explain and define the theory/approach and connect it up to any other relevant aspects of the group process. Use your textbook (use of additional outside sources is optional) and proper citations.
Next, apply the theory to your group. This section should employ specific examples and observations of the communication behavior in the group. It is important to use direct observations (e.g., quoted statements from group discussions, descriptions of particular behaviors, etc.) rather than your indirect impressions of group process. For example, it is better to write, â€œAlicia demonstrated her high control needs by assigning tasks to people at the start of every meeting,â€ rather than, â€œEveryone seemed to feel that Alicia was too controlling.â€ Use particular behaviors and statements as the database for your analysis.
Conclude with a candid evaluation. What is the theoryâ€™s utility or value in explaining what occurred? How might knowledge of the theory improve the communication of the group? What could have been done differently? What critical questions about leadership can be raised? Get insightful here!